Handling Complaints with AI – From a Cost Center to a Competitive Advantage

In a typical B2B company, the complaint-handling process hasn’t changed in years. A customer sends an email; an employee copies the data into Excel or directly into the ERP system, searches for customer and product details in various places, and exchanges several emails with colleagues and the client. Meanwhile, the customer waits — losing patience and trust.

Complaint handling costs

The numbers are brutal. In the B2B sector, the average cost of handling a single complaint is 60–100 PLN. This isn’t just labor cost — it’s time spent fixing transcription errors, endless back-and-forth communications, and cross-department coordination. Most processes still run through email, phone calls, and Excel, which means no structure, no automation, and no real-time tracking.

A response time of 2–3 days? For a customer experiencing an issue with a product critical to their business, that feels like an eternity. Even worse: research shows that 15–25% of customers churn after a bad complaint experience. In B2B — where acquiring a new customer costs far more than retaining an existing one — these aren't abstract numbers. They represent significant lost revenue. One in four customers who have a negative complaint experience simply moves to a competitor.

Anatomy of the Problem: A Day in Customer Service

Let’s zoom in. Jan - Costumer Service employee - receives about 30 complaint emails every day. Each message needs to be read, analyzed, manually entered into the system, and responded to. That’s 3–4 hours per day spent on repetitive tasks that add no real value.

The real problem emerges when the process is unstructured. A customer writes: “Something’s wrong with the printer I bought in May.” Instantly, Jan needs answers to: Which printer? What serial number? Which invoice? May of this year or last year? The result? Three or four emails exchanged just to clarify the basics. The customer becomes frustrated, Jan wastes time, and the company pays for the chaos. And the issue keeps resurfacing, because nothing is documented properly and information is scattered across different places.

Solving this problem requires a shift in mindset. When you automate the complaint-handling process, you gain far more than cost reduction — you free up employees’ time so they can focus on activities that truly create business value.

Example of Change in Practice

Let’s return to Jan. After automation is introduced, 70% of complaints enter the system automatically through a self-service portal. Jan doesn’t rewrite anything anymore — he reviews and approves submissions that the system has already analyzed and categorized.

Those 3–4 hours a day? He now spends them talking to key clients about their needs, new products, and opportunities to expand cooperation. This isn’t just cost optimization — it’s better use of talent and competencies already present in the organization.

Structured processes also eliminate recurring mistakes. No more revisiting the same issue multiple times because someone forgot to save a critical detail or didn’t know a colleague had already spoken with the client.

An effective solution for B2B complaint handling is built on three interconnected components: a self-service portal, artificial intelligence, and an ERP system. The key point is that none of these elements solves the problem alone — the real value emerges only when they work together.

B2B Self-Service Portal

This is the customer’s “window into the company.” It is the place where they can submit a complaint, track its status in real time, receive automatic updates, and access the complete history of all submitted cases. The portal provides transparency and continuity, something an ERP system alone cannot offer in direct customer interactions.

Imagine the typical scenario: A customer sends an email. Joanna from support is on vacation. The message sits in her inbox for two days. The customer calls — frustration builds. Eventually, Kasia picks up the case and has to start from scratch, because nothing was documented.

In a system with a self-service portal, the customer submits a complaint via a simple form (or even by email — which the system parses automatically). They immediately receive a case number and can check the status at any time. Whether Joanna is on vacation or not, all details are recorded in the system and can be picked up instantly by any authorized employee.

Artificial Intelligence

AI understands intent and extracts key information from unstructured communication.
When a customer writes: “Something is wrong with the printer I bought in May”, AI can identify the relevant details, ask supplementary questions, or look up purchase history to determine which product is involved. The system analyzes the message, recognizes the type of issue, assigns a priority and category, and automatically creates a case in the ERP.

ERP System

The ERP system stores master data and orchestrates the entire workflow. It knows who the customer is, which products they purchased, their complaint history, and who the responsible account owner is. ERP manages the workflow end-to-end — determining who should handle the case, what the next steps are, when to send notifications, and when an escalation is required.

They email Joanna. Joanna manually enters the data into SAP. The customer waits. Joanna makes a mistake. The customer calls again. The self-service portal solves this by becoming the missing “customer-facing layer” that ERP systems never had.

Let’s examine a real business situation. We have a client — let’s call him Rafał. He’s 60 years old, runs a small store, and has always contacted companies via email. He has one address saved in his contacts: reklamacje@your-company.com. Rafał writes:

Click to zoomImg > MSG_Client1

Click to zoomImg > cs vs bot

Rafał immediately receives an automatic response:

Click to zoomImg > MSG_bot1

Rafał is satisfied — he wrote an email exactly as he always has, but this time he received an instant, structured response. The company is satisfied — the case is in the system, no employee spent 20 minutes retyping information, and Rafał can track everything himself.

A portal is not just a form for handling a single case — it is a complete history visible to both the customer and the company. Rafał can check at any moment: “Case assigned, 10:45. Issue diagnosed, 14:20. Spare part ordered, 16:00. Part shipped — courier will deliver tomorrow.” No phone calls asking “what’s happening with my case?”. No emails saying “any update?”. The customer has clarity and control, and the company saves time.

A complaint portal can be much more than just a tool for handling cases. It becomes an additional, contextual communication channel with the customer. Imagine this: a customer submits a complaint through the portal. The system notices that the product warranty expires in a month. It can suggest a warranty extension—precisely at the moment when the customer is thinking about service and product reliability. This isn’t spam — it’s contextual communication delivered when the customer is already engaged.

Or another scenario: the customer reports an issue with a printer. The system detects that a new firmware update is available for this model — one that addresses common issues. It can immediately suggest a service appointment.

Click to zoomImg > The same applies to service campaigns

The same applies to service campaigns, loyalty programs, or information about complementary products. The portal becomes a touchpoint for building relationships, not only for resolving issues. And most importantly—it does so intelligently and contextually, without overwhelming the customer with irrelevant information.

For the customer to initiate the process smoothly, and for the service team to continue it efficiently, the ERP system operating behind the portal must connect functions across multiple areas of the company. This is not a simple transfer of data from point A to point B—it is the orchestration of a complex business process.

The ERP system must have access to:

• Customer interaction history — whether this is the first contact or a repeated issue.

• Logistics processes — whether the product should be picked up and who covers the shipping cost.

• Quality control — whether the product is actually defective or if the issue stems from incorrect usage.

• Service operations — who is qualified to repair the product, which parts are needed, and what the turnaround time is.

• Sales operations — whether a credit note should be issued or a replacement shipped.

Each of these areas may belong to a different department, with separate procedures and systems. The ERP must connect them all and ensure a smooth flow of information.

Flexibility of the process

The system must be flexible enough for the process to follow different paths depending on the circumstances. One complaint may require only a product replacement. Another may require a service repair. Yet another may involve a technical consultation and instructions for the customer. The ERP system must be able to dynamically adjust the workflow to the specifics of each individual case.

Status control at every stage is essential. The logic of the process is governed by the execution statuses of individual operations. For example: before a repair, the system receives the returned product and performs an inspection, then determines the next steps. At the same time, the customer compensation status remains open and monitored until the repair is completed.

Based on dozens of implementations in various industries, four fundamental principles have emerged that determine the success or failure of a complaint-handling automation project. Understanding them thoroughly is crucial before starting any implementation work.

Do not force the customer to change their habits

It sounds obvious, yet most digital transformation projects still make exactly this mistake. A company invests in a modern portal full of features, and then is surprised that customers still prefer to send emails or call.

Why? Because the company expects customers to change long-established habits. Rafał has been writing emails for 30 years. He has the address reklamacje@your-company.com
saved in his contacts. He will not start creating an account on a portal, inventing a password, and logging in—not immediately, not as the first step. A good solution accepts all communication channels. Email, portal, phone—every path should lead to the same system. If the customer sends an email, AI processes it and creates a case. If the customer prefers a portal form, perfect. If someone calls, the consultant inputs the information into the same workflow. Over time, as customers experience the value of the portal—status tracking, full history, faster responses—they will naturally begin to use it. But they cannot be forced. Habit migration is a process, not a switch.

Do not require too much — keep the form minimal

The second classic mistake: the company designs a complaint form that requires filling in 15 mandatory fields. Serial number, purchase date, invoice number, product code, detailed problem description, defect category, preferred contact method, consent for data processing, consent for marketing…

The result? The customer starts filling out the form, gets frustrated after three fields, closes the page, and calls instead. Or worse—contacts a competitor. The more you require, the more submissions will be abandoned halfway through. This has been proven in many UX studies—each additional form field increases the abandonment rate.

A good form is minimal. It asks only the absolutely essential questions: What happened? Which product? How can we contact you? Everything else can be supplemented later or pulled automatically from the system. Moreover, a well-designed system can be intelligent. If the customer is logged in, the system already knows who they are and which products they purchased. It can suggest: “Are you referring to the LaserPro 3000 printer you purchased on May 15, 2024?” The customer clicks “yes” — done, no need to type the serial number or look for an invoice.

Key rule: More completed submissions — even if initially incomplete — are better than fewer “perfectly” filled ones. You can always ask for additional details later, but you cannot recover a customer who abandoned the form halfway.

KPI from day zero — without numbers you cannot prove ROI

This is a rule many companies ignore at the start and regret later. “We’ll implement the system, see how it works, and then maybe measure something.” No. This does not work.

Without measuring your current state, you won’t know whether anything has actually improved. Without defined success metrics, you will only guess whether the project paid off. And when leadership asks in a year, “What is the ROI?”, you will have nothing to show except “customers seem satisfied.”


Before you start the project, measure a few key metrics:

• How many complaints do you receive monthly?

• What is the average handling time per complaint?

• How much employee time is consumed by manual processing?

• What percentage of customers call again asking about their status?

• What is your customer satisfaction (NPS)?

• How many complaints require escalation?

Calculate costs as well. If one complaint costs 80 PLN of employee time, and you receive 200 per month, that’s 16,000 PLN monthly—almost 200,000 PLN annually. These are concrete numbers you can compare later.

After implementation, measure the same KPIs. Did the handling time drop from 3 days to a few hours? Did the number of “status check” inquiries drop by 70%? Did NPS rise from 6.5 to 8.5? These are tangible indicators of success.


Define 3–5 KPIs to track:

• Adoption rate — what percentage of customers use the portal

• First Contact Resolution — % of cases resolved at the first interaction

• Customer Effort Score — how easy it was for the customer to submit the issue

• Percentage of automatically processed submissions

• Cost per case — total operational cost per complaint

These are numbers you can show to the board and CFO. Without them, your project is “a nice technology initiative.” With them, it becomes “we saved 150,000 PLN annually and improved customer satisfaction by 30%.”

Feedback loop — listen, react, improve

The last rule is often the most neglected, yet it is crucial for long-term success. Many companies treat the implementation as a one-time project: “We launched it, it works, done.”

That is a huge mistake. A system that does not evolve based on user feedback becomes less useful over time. Customer needs change, business processes evolve, new products appear. The system must adapt. Worse: customers rarely report problems proactively. If something is inconvenient or poorly designed, they simply stop using it or use it reluctantly. They won’t write: “Hey, this form is too complicated.” They’ll just go back to emailing.

You must actively collect feedback and respond to it:

• Automatic micro-survey after each closed complaint — three emoticons: 😞 😐 😊. Takes 5 seconds. Optional text field.

• A visible “Something’s not working?” button — low barrier to reporting issues. One click, short note, done.

• Regular sessions with power users — invite 5–10 frequent portal users for a one-hour conversation. These sessions are gold mines of practical suggestions.

• Behavioral analytics — data doesn’t lie. Check where customers abandon forms, which fields take the longest, which features are used the most.

But collecting feedback is only half the job. The other half is reacting quickly.
If after a month you see that 40% of customers abandon the form at the “enter serial number” field, don’t wait six months. Simplify the field, add an example, or make it optional. And inform customers: “Based on your suggestions, we simplified the process — it is now easier than ever.” This shows you listen and value their input. It builds trust and improves adoption.

The feedback loop is not a one-time action — it is a continuous process. Every quarter, review data, identify the 2–3 most urgent issues, fix them, measure the impact, repeat. A system that does not evolve dies. A system that evolves based on real user needs becomes indispensable.

Many companies make the mistake of trying to implement everything at once. A client portal, service module, spare parts management, CRM integration, automated invoicing—all rolled into a single project.

The result? The project lasts two years, costs millions, and when something finally launches, half of the features are unused because no one had time to test them.

A more effective approach: 12 months, 5 processes. From complaints to a full platform. Step by step, each new process easier than the previous one because the foundation is already in place.

Click to zoomImg > 01

Click to zoomImg > 02

Click to zoomImg > 03

Click to zoomImg > 04

Click to zoomImg > 05

Each stage delivers standalone value. You don’t need to wait until the entire project is finished to see benefits. After three months, you already have functioning complaint management. After six months—you add service. Each stage brings another success story, more savings, and more satisfied customers.

Of course, this roadmap is only an example of what the journey might look like. Your path may be completely different, depending on your processes and priorities. But the way of thinking about developing customer service should be exactly the same.

Let’s be direct: no project gets approved without solid financial justification. “It will be great” is not enough. You need numbers that prove the business case.

Direct savings

Let’s start with a simple calculation. If the average cost of handling one complaint is 80 PLN, and you receive 200 complaints per month, that’s 16,000 PLN per month — 192,000 PLN per year.

Click to zoomImg > Example savings after implementation

After automation and portal deployment, a 50% reduction in operational costs is realistic. Half of submissions are processed automatically, employees spend far less time per case.

These are only direct operational savings. They do not include:

• The value of employee time redirected to revenue-generating work

• Reduction of errors and related costs

• Savings from lower customer churn

Customer retention: the real value

However, the largest benefit does not come from savings — it comes from retaining customers who would otherwise leave.

Click to zoomImg > Example retention calculation

Suddenly, an investment of 200,000–300,000 PLN in a portal and automation doesn’t look like a cost.
It looks like revenue protection.

NPS and the marketing effect

There is another, harder-to-measure but very real benefit: an increase in your Net Promoter Score and the strength of customer advocacy. Companies with the highest NPS grow on average 2.5x faster than competitors (Bain & Company).

Customers who have a positive complaint-handling experience are more likely to:

• Recommend the company to others

• Buy more, and more often

• Stay loyal even at higher price points

• Give the company a second chance when issues occur

These effects compound over time. A company with NPS 8 vs. a company with NPS 5 sees dramatically different growth.

You’re convinced. You see the value. Now what? How do you move from theory to execution?

Click to zoomImg > Step 1

Before doing anything else, understand your current state. How many complaints per month? Through which channels? What is the average handling time? Don’t guess—measure. Calculate the cost. Average handling time × employee hourly rate = cost per case. This is your baseline. Measure customer satisfaction as well. If you don’t have NPS or CSAT, implement a simple micro-survey today.

Click to zoomImg > Step 2

Complaints are usually the best starting point, but not always. Choose a process that hurts the most (high volume of cases, many complaints), has a clearly defined beginning and end, is relatively standard, and has measurable KPIs.

Click to zoomImg > Step 3

What will you measure in 3 months? In 6 months? In a year? Choose the key indicators that truly reflect business success: average resolution time, cost per case, portal adoption rate, NPS / CSAT, and the percentage of first contact resolution.

Click to zoomImg > Step 4

You don’t need to reinvent everything. Companies like Hycom and IPOPEMA have done this dozens of times across industries. We can show you:

• Case studies from similar companies

• ROI calculations based on your numbers

• A realistic implementation timeline

• References from companies that already deployed such solutions